ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Many landmark trials have challenged the need for extensive axillary surgery and radiation in breast cancer patients. De-escalation of axillary treatment could potentially result in less breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL). Our study aims to define the incidence and trends of BRCL over the last 15 years. METHOD(S): Since 2005, our institution has prospectively screened breast cancer patients for lymphedema during and after treatment with a Perometer. 2,334 women diagnosed with breast cancer with baseline arm volume measurements and at least 2 follow-up measurements were divided into 3 cohorts based on date of surgery (Cohort 1: 2005-2010, Cohort 2:2011-2016, Cohort 3: 2016-2022). The cohorts were selected to coincide with publications of the landmark trials NSABP B-32, ASCOG Z0011, ASCOG Z1071, and EORTC 10981-22023 AMAROS which demonstrated safety in reducing the number of axillary lymph node dissections (ALND). Lymphedema was defined as a relative volume change of 10% or greater from preoperative baseline at least 3 months post-operatively. In cases of bilateral surgery, the weight-adjusted arm volume change equation was utilized. Cohort, age, BMI, axillary surgery type, chemotherapy timing, radiation type, and surgery type were all included in the multivariate analysis. RESULT(S): The overall incidence of BCRL was 12.8%, with a 29.6% incidence for those undergoing ALND and a 6.4% incidence for those undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy. While the number of ALND performed decreased between cohorts (Figure 1), there was no significant difference in BCRL between assigned cohorts (HR 1.02 (95% CI [0.69, 1.51], p=0.930 for cohort 3 vs cohort 1). On multivariate analysis, significant associations with development of BCRL were identified with older age (HR 1.02;95% CI [1.01, 1.03], p=0.002), higher BMI (HR 1.05;95% CI [1.04, 1.07], p< 0.0001) and ALND (HR increased the risk of (HR 3.67;95% CI [2.62, 5.13], p< .0001). Regional lymph node radiation was not significantly associated with BCRL. CONCLUSION(S): Despite a reduction in the number of ALND performed over time, we did not see a dramatic reduction in the incidence of BCRL. Interestingly, between cohort 2 and cohort 3 there was a stable incidence of ALND which could be related to the COVID pandemic with an increase in more advanced cancers and a decrease in the ability to screen patients for BCRL during that time period.
ABSTRACT
Background: The introduction of the novel COVID-19 vaccination raised concerns regarding side effects from patients who had undergone breast cancer treatment. Lymph node swelling after the mRNA vaccines (Moderna, Pfizer) is a distressing side effect for women treated for breast cancer as it may indicate cancer progression or recurrence. Patients at risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) are fearful that lymph node swelling from the vaccine could incite or worsen BCRL. Data investigating associated side effects in this population is essential for patient education and future self-advocacy. Purpose(s): The purpose of this study was to elicit side effects associated with the COVID vaccine in women treated for breast cancer. Method(s): 4,945 surveys were sent to women over the age of 18 who had received breast cancer treatment and had been prospectively screened for BCRL with perometry. 621 participants who received an mRNA vaccine and responded to the survey were included in analysis, 469 of whom completed booster dose surveys. Participants were asked about type and duration of side effects after each vaccine dose. Solicited side effects included injection site soreness, swelling, or redness;swelling, numbness, or heaviness of the arm;generalized muscle soreness (GMS);fatigue;headache;joint pain;chills;nausea;vomiting;fever;Bell's palsy;axillary or supraclavicular lymph node swelling;other;or none of the above. We computed frequencies and the median duration of side effects for each dose. To investigate predictors of side effects, we fit multivariable logistic regression models separately for each side effect, with random effects for participants to account for clustered responses. We considered significant predictors those with p < 0.05. Result(s): Of the 621 participants, the median follow-up time between breast surgery and date of first vaccine dose was 69 months. The distribution of the top 5 side effects is presented in Table 1. Of note, the majority of participants who reported lymph node swelling (9.8% dose 1, 12.9% dose 2, 11.3% dose 3) reported it in the axilla ipsilateral to the vaccine (54.1% D1, 61.3% D2, 71.7% D3). Lymph node swelling was also reported in the axilla contralateral to the vaccine (45.9% D1, 45% D2, 24.5% D3), supraclavicular region ipsilateral (29.5% D1, 26.3% D2, 32.1% D3) and contralateral (18% D1, 18.8% D2, 9.4% D3) to the vaccine. Older patients reported each side effect significantly less frequently. Those who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy reported significantly more GMS and headache than those who did not. Those who had received regional lymph node radiation were less likely to report GMS, as were patients who had sentinel lymph node biopsies (vs. no lymph node surgery). The median duration of side effects for all three doses was 48 hours or less, with the plurality (41.0% D1, 38.7% D2, 44.1% D3) of participants reporting side effects lasting 24 hours or less. While all side effects apart from injection site soreness were significantly more common in the second than the first doses, the duration of side effects only increased for 28.1% of participants. Conclusion(s): Over 86% of women treated for breast cancer may experience at least one side effect after any dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. This data, collected specifically for patients with breast cancer, will help enhance guidelines for structured and universal education regarding additional doses of the vaccine in the future. This will allow patients to better understand COVID vaccine side effect profiles after breast cancer treatment and self-advocate prior to future doses. (Table Presented).